Eventbrite alternative - RegToEVENT - ticketing service

---

✅ RegToEVENT's Strengths Compared to Eventbrite

1. Full Control Over Registration and Attendee Data

• RegToEVENT offers highly customizable registration forms, including required and optional fields, different forms for different ticket types, visual customization, field ordering, and more. This gives event organizers significantly greater flexibility in collecting the information they need from attendees.

• According to publicly available information, Eventbrite provides standard registration, ticket sales, and attendee management features. However, customization of registration fields and advanced form configuration is not always available at the same level. startpack.ru

• As a result, for events that require advanced data collection (surveys, additional attendee information, multiple participant groups), RegToEVENT offers a clear advantage.

---

2. Flexibility of ticket types and additional options (add-ons, donations, partner sales, ticket partners)

• RegToEVENT provides not just basic tickets, but also additional options, donations, and the ability to involve “ticket partners” for selling tickets. This gives organizers more flexibility in monetization.

• Eventbrite, although it has a flexible ticketing system - free, paid, donation tickets, promo codes, groups, discounts, etc. hellip.com - nevertheless, for complex custom schemes (for example, donations + additional services + partner sales) it may require either external development, or it may be inconvenient/limited.

---

3. White label approach / more flexible attitude toward organizer branding

• Public information about Eventbrite mentions that for standard users branding is significantly limited, and events are displayed within the Eventbrite ecosystem, alongside other events, which may “dilute” the organizer’s brand. blog.promotix.com

• RegToEVENT, apparently, was originally designed as a standalone solution controlled by the organizer - meaning the organizer can use custom branding, not “similar to Eventbrite”. This is valuable if the organizer wants to design their own style, the “face” of the event, without third-party logos, extra links, or advertising for other events.

---

4. Transparent platform role and management of financial terms (commission tracking, responsibility for taxes / GDPR / finances)

• RegToEVENT acts as an intermediary for payment processing, charging a fixed 2.5% commission - and it is clearly stated that responsibility for taxes and GDPR lies with the organizer. This gives the organizer a fully defined financial and legal structure.

• In Eventbrite - their commission + the system of payment distribution and additional fees (service fees, payment processing charges) may be less transparent for organizers, especially if the event has complex logistics. startpack.ru

• Thus, for organizers who value transparency of conditions and want to minimize “hidden” fees, RegToEVENT may be preferable.

---

5. Support for advanced functionality for sophisticated event scenarios (webinars, networking, live streaming, etc.), taking technical requirements into account

• RegToEVENT supports not only ticket sales, but also a comprehensive set of services - registration forms, a CRM system, QR and bar code generation, check-in, analytics, live streaming, integrations, and more.

• Eventbrite's documentation notes that online events often require external integrations (for example, via Zoom), and that it offers "limited" custom branding options for standard users. blog.promotix.com

• In other words, for complex business events, conferences, and hybrid events with networking, additional services, and donations, RegToEVENT provides the ability to build exactly the functionality you need from the ground up, without being constrained by the limitations of a general-purpose platform. .

---

6. Cost and time optimization compared to manual management, with the ability to avoid unnecessary third-party fees and limitations

• As stated on the RegToEVENT website, using an automated ticketing system saves time and money compared to manual record keeping, payment verification, ticket distribution, and manually managed registration. regtoevent.com

• This is especially relevant if an organizer plans to hold regular events or wants to scale their business - in that case, a centralized, flexible, and customizable system tailored to specific needs is more beneficial than a standard template.

---

⚠️ Where RegToEVENT can be especially beneficial (addressing Eventbrite's limitations)

It is worth noting that despite Eventbrite's advantages, it has certain limitations that become critical for many professional event organizers:

• Limited page customization and branding capabilities on standard plans. blog.promotix.com

• It is often necessary to use external systems for online events (webinars, streaming), which makes integration more complex. blog.promotix.com

• Limited flexibility for non-standard scenarios - additional services, donations, partner sales, and complex attendee segmentation - may not be well supported by Eventbrite. saasworthy.com

---

📊 Key commission figures for Eventbrite and RegToEVENT

• Eventbrite (according to its official model): for paid tickets - a tiered fee structure: service fee 3.7% + $1.79 per ticket + payment processing fee 2.9% per order. eventbrite.com

• For RegToEVENT (based on your data), the commission depends on the event type. For “small” events up to 999 tickets - 3.5% + fixed €0.30 per ticket. RegToEVENT

• Important: payment processing fees (bank/payment gateway fees) when using RegToEVENT are paid by the organizer separately (or via the payment gateway turnover). RegToEVENT

---

🧮 Example: 800 people, €50 ticket

Let’s assume you are selling 800 tickets at €50. Total gross revenue:

800 × €50 = €40,000

---

- Eventbrite scenario

Assuming similar rates as in their official offer (varies by country - but for this example we’ll use approximately 3.7% + fixed fee + ~3% processing):

• Service fee: 3.7% of €40,000 = €1,480

• Fixed fee (per ticket): $1.79 ≈ €1.70 → 800 × €1.70 = €1,360

• (plus payment processing - approx. ~2.9% of total, or ~€1,160)

Total commission: approximately €4,000 (around 10% of revenue).

If the organizer “absorbs” the commission - it becomes their expense.
If the commission is passed to the buyer - the ticket price becomes higher.

---

- RegToEVENT scenario

We apply the base rate of 2.5% + €0.33 per ticket:

• Percentage: 2.5% of €40,000 = €1,000

• Fixed fee: 800 × €0.33 = €264

Total commission: €1,264 (≈ 3.2% of revenue) + possible payment processing fees, say another 2–3 % (depending on the payment gateway).

Even including payment processing fees, the final amount may be ~€2,200–€2,500, which is still significantly lower than Eventbrite.

---

✅ Conclusion: why RegToEVENT may be more cost-effective (under these parameters)

• When selling a large number of tickets (800+), RegToEVENT’s commission ends up being 1.5–2× lower than using Eventbrite (all else being equal).

• This translates into savings on fees, which is especially noticeable for large-scale events - meaning more net revenue remains with the organizer, or alternatively a more competitive ticket price can be offered to participants while maintaining the same budget.

• This scenario is especially beneficial if the organizer manages payment processing themselves - in that case RegToEVENT provides both flexibility + lower platform-based fees.

---

⚠️ Important considerations and risks

• Payment processing fees in RegToEVENT are separate and may vary (depending on the payment gateway, bank, and country), so the final level of savings is not always maximized.

• If ticket prices are low, the fixed + percentage model in RegToEVENT may not result in significant savings.

• Eventbrite has marketing and technological advantages (marketplace, brand recognition, ready-made tools), which can sometimes justify the higher commission, especially if you rely on traffic and “organic discovery” through their platform.

---